Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Carolina Kuhl vs Ania Hertel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kuhl vs Hertel analysis and find out who is favored!
Carolina Kuhl vs Ania Hertel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kuhl 1 - 0 Hertel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kuhl has won 46.11% of points on their second serve, while Hertel has won 37.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kuhl, in recent form, has won 61.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hertel has won 58.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.3% and 37.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kuhl has saved 46.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hertel has saved 51.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kuhl has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 35/ 25), with Hertel winning 47.27% (W/L 26/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kuhl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10). Hertel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 65/ 62), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 24/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Kuhl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 21/ 21), where as Hertel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 14/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kuhl winning 1 times and Hertel being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kuhl winning 2 and Hertel winning 0. The last match between Kuhl and Hertel was at the W50 Edgbaston, 04-02-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Carolina Kuhl getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kuhl and Hertel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kuhl winning 0 times and Hertel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kuhl winning 0, and Hertel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kuhl has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.97 while Hertel has played against players with an average rank of 144.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kuhl has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hertel has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kuhl has converted 56.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hertel has converted 49.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
504
Rank
396
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
698
Rank
694
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
60% (59-40)
Career Total W/L
51% (92-89)
58% (21-15)
YTD W/L
42% (10-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Carolina Kuhl | Ania Hertel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (25/35) | 63% (26/41) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (21/25) | 62% (16/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (7/10) | 7% (1/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (24/41) | 20% (7/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Ania Hertel
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Carolina Kuhl | Ania Hertel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (21/15) | 42% (10/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (47/33) | 43% (25/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (396/313) | 46% (238/279) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 44% (7/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 85 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 119 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:47 | 2:1:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 273.61 | 155.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1425/2273) | 57% (1004/1764) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (874/1425) | 62% (627/1004) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (391/848) | 38% (286/760) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (176/311) | 48% (96/200) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (1144/2305) | 45% (781/1734) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (12/11) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 43% (6/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (21/35) | 42% (10/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (23/19) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (23/4) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 20% (15/3) |
Carolina Kuhl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Carolina Kuhl
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Carolina Kuhl
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Anali Kocevar
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
44%
(
27 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
45 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Melisa Ercan
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Carolina Kuhl
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Angelica Raggi
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Alessandra Mazzola
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
49 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Viola Turini
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Ania Hertel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Bertacchi
Player
Ania Hertel
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
6
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Victoria Borodulina
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Ania Hertel
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Laura Boehner
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luna Vujovic
Player
Ania Hertel
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Yesypchuk
Player
Ania Hertel
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Divine Dasam Nweke
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
11
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sevil Yuldasheva
Player
Ania Hertel
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Ania Hertel
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kuhl Vs Hertel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kuhl are available here and Hertel photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Carolina Kuhl
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ania Hertel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
